Go Back   Cigar Weekly Community Forums and Discussion Groups > Smoking Post > Cigar Reviews

Cigar Reviews This room is for organized blind reviews, individual reviews by CW Members and reviews entered into the database that the Editors feel are particularly well done.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-11-2004, 05:13 AM   #40
mannish
Herf God
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Springville, AL USA
Posts: 15,792
the ratings due to advertising is a very ignorant 'theory' . It's been said numerous times (and rightly so) that CA has lots of high-end products in their mag from watches to boats. What makes you think they need cigar advertising dollars when Caddilac, hotels in Atlantic city, Dom Perignon, Caesars Palace...etc advertise in there. You really think with advertisers at that level that they NEED Torano or ANY cigar makers dollars in exchange for ratings....

Hello use the grey matter. They could drop ALL cigar advertsiting and it would not hurt their advertising sales.

The good ratings vs advertising is completely ignorant they do not need cigar advertisers they have world class products that have much deeper pockets than cigar makers.

The Toranos are good I haven't smoked a 1916 yet but they are good cigars
I do not call them great.
mannish is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 AM.