New cigarette warning labels mandated. Cigars next?

[N99]

Dead Body, Cancerous Lungs to Appear on U.S. Cigarette Packs, FDA Decides


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...next-year.html

Quote:
By Molly Peterson - Jun 21, 2011 4:32 AM PT

Images of a corpse and cancerous lungs are among the nine graphic warnings tobacco companies led by Altria Group Inc. (MO) must start placing on cigarette packs sold in the U.S. next year.
The labels, required under a two-year-old tobacco law to convey the health effects of smoking, also include pictures of rotting teeth and a man exhaling smoke through a hole in his neck, the Food and Drug Administration said today on its website. The FDA selected the nine images from 36 it proposed last year.

Cigarettes can’t be sold in the U.S. after Oct. 22, 2012, without the warnings, part of the biggest tobacco marketing rules change in a quarter century. Each pack must carry one of the nine labels pairing images with text such as “Smoking can kill you.” The graphics must cover the top half of the front and back of cigarette packages and 20 percent of print ads.

“These labels are frank, honest and powerful depictions of the health risks of smoking, and they will help,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said today in an e- mail. “These labels will encourage smokers to quit and prevent children from smoking.”

U.S. cigarette packs and ads now carry one of four text warnings under a federal law enacted in 1984. The messages include “Cigarette Smoke Contains Carbon Monoxide” and “Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy.” They aren’t paired with images.

Canada, the U.K. and Brazil are among countries that require graphic cigarette warnings. One in five Canadian smokers reported smoking less as a result of the graphic labels in a 2004 study of more than 600 people.

Cigarette Makers

Altria’s Philip Morris USA of Richmond, Virginia, the biggest U.S. cigarette maker, broke with rivals Reynolds American Inc. (RAI) and Lorillard Tobacco Co. to back the 2009 tobacco law as a way to standardize manufacturing rules and spur development of less-harmful tobacco products.

Reynolds, based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and Greensboro, North Carolina-based Lorillard are among tobacco companies seeking to overturn the law’s graphic warning-label requirements. Altria isn’t part of the lawsuit.
It’s unconstitutional for the government to “confiscate the top 50 percent of both sides of cigarette packaging and mandate shocking color graphics,” Reynolds and Lorillard said in September in a brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati.

More than 20 percent of adults in the U.S., or 46 million people, smoke cigarettes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Smoking is the biggest cause of preventable death in the U.S., killing about 443,000 people a year, according to the CDC. The Obama administration is pushing to reduce the U.S. smoking rate to 12 percent in a decade.

To contact the reporter on this story: Molly Peterson in Washington at mpeterson9@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Adriel Bettelheim at abettelheim@bloomberg.net

I shall not put the wonderful images up that our dear govt will be putting on packs of cigarettes, and I wonder how long before cigar makers will have to put said images of death and destruction full size on boxes of cigars?

Woo



Hoo.

[hockeymaniac]

Those pictures don't bother me one bit. I watched an autopsy while eating lunch during first responder training. I would hate to see them on cigar boxes only because they would ruin the box. They won't deter me from smoking cigars.

[beevod]

Why stop, then with cigarettes. How about a 420 pound person on all ice cream, cookie and pizza labels.

[hockeymaniac]

I saw a phot gallery of the labels. They won't work. They are way to tame to scare anybody.

[BigJohn]

Originally Posted by beevod

Why stop, then with cigarettes. How about a 420 pound person on all ice cream, cookie and pizza labels.

Truth!
But just as we're all desensitized to Violence on TV, and sex (hubba hubba) in the media, these lables won't deter a thing.
It's more "feel good" nanny state legislation.

[cigarfan]

Originally Posted by bigjohn

....
It's more "feel good" nanny state legislation.

Like William J. Le Petomaine said...

"Holy underwear! Sheriff murdered! Innocent women and children blown to bits! We have to protect our phoney baloney jobs here, gentlemen! We must do something about this immediately! Immediately! Immediately! Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph! "

[Cigary43]

They can put whatever they want on cigarette packages...I don't smoke them anyway. If they want to put a picture on cigars...g'head and try to fit it on a cello or put it on the box. I buy singles and 5 paks more than I do boxes and it wouldn't matter if they put dead bodies for pictures...I'm still going to enjoy my cigars no matter. The Anti Smoking Lobby can kiss my a$$.

[Catdeddy]

It won't stop anyone. All it shows is the sheer stupidity and wastefulness of our gov't. and it's spending of our tax dollars.

If someone is so damn stupid as to not know the hazards already, they need thinning out of the herd anyway.

And if they are so gullible, or naive, or whatever you want to call it, that a picture of a rotting, diseased, cancerous lung makes them stop, then they should not have started in the first place. And probably could stand a little thinning out, also.

Both are Darwin Awards waiting to happen.

[CJ3]

I'm wondering when the Nanny state will begin to regulate the minimum amount of sleep you must get each night, perhaps with government supplied, mini bed-cam, GPS enabled, alarm clocks. (with fierce lobbying supporting the measure by the manufacturer of said government required devices, of course. Ahhh....nothing finer than "Capitalism by Fiat," eh?)

After all, who's more dangerous on the road than a sleepy driver? Why its just as bad as driving drunk, or so the studies say.

Its long been my assumption that NYS will eventually require a State Case Worker to be assigned at birth, so that all aspects of your life can be monitored and mandated.

Current prognostication? Soon, you won't be able to have a backyard pool without a certified lifeguard.

[N99]

Originally Posted by CJ3

I'm wondering when the Nanny state will begin to regulate the minimum amount of sleep you must get each night, perhaps with government supplied, mini bed-cam, GPS enabled, alarm clocks. (with fierce lobbying supporting the measure by the manufacturer of said government required devices, of course. Ahhh....nothing finer than "Capitalism by Fiat," eh?)

After all, who's more dangerous on the road than a sleepy driver? Why its just as bad as driving drunk, or so the studies say.

Its long been my assumption that NYS will eventually require a State Case Worker to be assigned at birth, so that all aspects of your life can be monitored and mandated.

Current prognostication? Soon, you won't be able to have a backyard pool without a certified lifeguard.

Maybe not that but they do want to put automatic thermostats in your house that they control....

http://www.smartmeters.com/the-news/...r-program.html

Officials from the village of Frankfort, New York, have been were recognized by the New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials (NYSCOM) for their “forward-thinking and with an eye toward the village’s bottom line” for installing smart electronic water and electric metering devices throughout the town’s service areas.