|
Cigar Talk A place for cigar enthusiasts to discuss our hobby, legal cigars and related stuff. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-10-2013, 07:59 AM | #1 | ||
Editor-in-Chief
Herf God
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 86,656
|
Another Study NO Cancer Link
From the blog Velvet Glove, Iron Fist
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
+In Memory of E.Guevara(Cubano67)W.Orlando(Shadow) A.Morris (Knife) D.Odom (dodom) D.Revermann (dgr) S.Bouchard (sb1396) M.Cole (Matt76) S.Faccenda (TOJE) R.Smith(IBMer) V.Vandermeer (van55)M.Davis(boxdoctor)S.Singer(bassman)K.Doetze l (drillrk1)D.Hart(garme1962)J.Coleman(John C 81)T.Gossett(Dartplayer1)J.Bolt (jb)E.J.Ferralles(CaballoPinto)M.Cataldo(FVFanMC)K Payne(SanchoPanza)F.Seltzer(Mowee)+LB+Connor Olson+Micah Kercheval+Maggie Bonefas+Karen |
||
12-10-2013, 08:31 AM | #2 |
Club Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,191
|
If only it would receive some press.
|
12-10-2013, 08:58 AM | #3 |
Chief Geek, @cigarweekly
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta (north burbs - Woodsto
Posts: 14,174
|
The actual findings will be very cool to see.
Words like "16 times" and "4 times" sound so HUGE! After all, 4 times a million dollars is, well, LOTTO worthy... but 4 times 1 cent = 4 cents.
__________________
Government breaks our legs, then hands us a pair of crutches and says, "You see? If it wasn't for us you wouldn't be able to walk.".... Aren't we so lucky!? Need a website? Get one from a BOTL - > PM me! "I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." Help support the CigarWeekly webhost (me!) > Shop online? Start HERE: direct to Amazon.com Protect your computer from VIRUSES > Get Avast! |
12-10-2013, 11:03 AM | #4 |
Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 3,135
|
The correct way to look at is this: If you buy a second lottery ticket, you have increased your chances of winning by 100%. Not that your chances are 100% (absolute risk), just that your one in a million is now two in a million (comparative risk). That is how they scare the public. Even if they could prove a 30% increase in lung cancer from SHS, it still isn't shit.
__________________
"Homer, slow down you'll kill us" yelled Marge. "Or die trying" exclaimed Homer. |
12-10-2013, 11:04 AM | #5 |
CW Squirrel Wrangler
Herf God
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: southwest Missouri
Posts: 35,518
|
and in other news, more than 30 years after widespread release, the artificial sweetener has once again been found to be harmless.
|
12-10-2013, 01:03 PM | #6 |
Herf God
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 16,351
|
Why is it when study after study shows second hand smoke is harmless but doesn't get reported. It's like the governments health care plan is not working or works very poorly, it's not getting widely reported either. I guess you call it selective reporting.
|
12-11-2013, 05:28 AM | #7 | |
Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
also - reporting that something doesn't have an effect isn't as sexy as saying "millions will die".
__________________
"Homer, slow down you'll kill us" yelled Marge. "Or die trying" exclaimed Homer. |
|
12-12-2013, 12:19 PM | #8 |
Self Exiled
Herf God
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Kearny, NJ
Posts: 40,584
|
I don't pay attention to case studies. Mainly, because the studies are slanted to state whatever (the group that is funding the study), wants it to state. For example, if the tobacco industry is financing the study, the study would state that there is no link to second hand smoke. If the AMA is financing the study, the study will state that there is a link to second hand smoke.
|
12-13-2013, 04:32 AM | #9 | |
Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
__________________
"Homer, slow down you'll kill us" yelled Marge. "Or die trying" exclaimed Homer. |
|
12-14-2013, 08:47 AM | #10 |
Contributing Editor
Herf God
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Camillus, NY
Posts: 16,121
|
The whole second hand smoke argument is just an excuse to ban smoking for two reasons. One is health and the other is that many people don't want to smell smoke.
In relation to health, people want to ban smoking not to protect the innocent bystanders. That's just the excuse to reach the smoker. Second hand smoke, while an irritant to someone who has asthma, is generally safe. The smell and odor has nothing to do with health issues. And, I have to admit that I don't always enjoy smelling smoke. I can remember as a kid sitting at a baseball game and having to deal with the smoke from some guy's cigarette. Or worse - some guy was smoking a stinky cigar. So I understand this part of the argument. But this should be decided by the business owners, not gov't.
__________________
Rob If people can tell me where to smoke, I can tell them where to go, too. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible HPV-oral cancer link | Boss Hogg | Cigar Talk | 2 | 08-28-2007 05:15 AM |
Cancer? | Harleyrider | Cigar Talk | 29 | 05-03-2007 11:55 AM |