Go Back   Cigar Weekly Community Forums and Discussion Groups > Smoking Post > Cigar Rights in America

Cigar Rights in America Discussion of smokers' rights in all 50 states.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-21-2023, 04:46 PM   #1
jefslat
CW WarCraft God
CW Special Correspondent
Editor at Large
Predominant CW Ambassador
Herf God
 
jefslat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Antonio de Bexar
Posts: 38,927
CRA Statement in Opposition to H.R. 5568 & S. 2846

On Tuesday, September 19, 2023, Congresswoman Robin Kelly (D-IL) and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced the CARE for Moms Act (H.R. 5568 & S. 2846), which is an extension of the Mothers and Offspring Mortality & Morbidity Awareness (MOMMA) Act that has been introduced in previous sessions of Congress.

The legislation seeks to establish a new federal entitlement program that addresses critical issues related to maternal health, access to prenatal and postpartum care, and seeks to provide the resources that mothers and babies need to thrive. Its funding relies largely on significant tax increase mechanisms targeting tobacco products, which include premium cigars. Given that there is no health rationale that would warrant inclusion of a hand made product that doesn’t have the mortality, morbidity, and youth usage concerns at the population level of mass-market tobacco products, we firmly maintain that premium cigars shouldn’t be used as a funding vehicle for these public policy health goals.

This bill's language is incredibly impactful for premium cigars, as it removes the existing federal tax rate of 52.75 percent, which currently caps the tax at 40.26 cents per cigar, and replaces it with a weight-based tax of $49.56 per pound, which is uncapped.

This change would fundamentally alter the cost of premium cigars. Moving to a weight-based taxation scheme disproportionately affects premium cigars, as they are significantly larger than mass-market products on a per-unit basis.

Mike Copperman, Director of Legislative & Regulatory Affairs at CRA, stated on the bill's release, "Addressing maternal health and providing access to programs and resources to mothers and babies is a fundamental issue that merits attention. However, prescribing massive tax increases on premium cigars and other tobacco products is not the way to achieve this, as it would result in considerable harm towards our legal, hand made, products and thus, CRA fundamentally opposes this bill in its current form."

CRA looks forward to continuing our work with supporters of this bill to differentiate premium cigars from other tobacco products and remove the tax increase provision on premium cigars.
__________________
El Gringo permanence...

El perro, el perro, es mi corazon.
El gato, el gato, el gato no es bueno.
El Jefe es cantante,
El Jefe es muy famoso
El Jefe es el hombre con el queso del diablo.

El perro, el perro, nunca sin raison
El gato, el gato, el gato es obseno
El Jefe es caliente, El Jefe es carinoso
El Jefe le da besos mejor que su esposo

What Would TOJE Do? Þ £
jefslat is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IPCPR Opposition to Topeka, Kansas ban. TommyBB Cigar Talk 7 09-11-2009 02:19 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM.